|
Post by nobabody on Mar 10, 2014 17:23:56 GMT
I enjoyed Paul Romanuk's commentary better. That's like comparing The Hockey News with Slapshot Scotland. Murphy's got to start somewhere. Not many more qualified hockey commentators in the world than Romanuk. Don't know why they ignored what was obvious on replay though. then why not pair Romanuk with Murphy? and i know you can't answer that it's more a suggestion than a question
|
|
|
Post by Dirty Lyle on Mar 10, 2014 17:54:36 GMT
Turns out clan asked for a review on the Henley incident the previous night but Hanson declined this!!!!, leaving Panthers at full strength, something smells here, who exactly is pulling Hansons strings
|
|
|
Post by ckbell63 on Mar 10, 2014 19:14:56 GMT
I think that Regan was saying panthers first had a man in the crease as well, that's why hewas going daft nothing to do with high sticks At first, I thought they were claiming Clarke put it in with his hand. What really annoyed me was the the "commentary" duo on Premier Sports. Not one of them acknowledged the fact that Haines had put the puck in, not Roehl. They even acknowledged they got a lot of tweets but didn't go into details. It was almost like he was afraid to ruffle any feathers. I enjoyed Paul Romanuk's commentary better. One of the commentators was a Panthers player hence the biased views. Rhoel kicked it and as you state Haines clearly knocked it in. There was a clear delay between the kicking action and the goal. Great effort though. Difference was most of their goals were scored by Brits'.
|
|
|
Post by swarfiga on Mar 10, 2014 20:05:06 GMT
Turns out clan asked for a review on the Henley incident the previous night but Hanson declined this!!!!, leaving Panthers at full strength, something smells here, who exactly is pulling Hansons strings I actually noticed for the first time I can remember on twitter and Facebook fans from clan and stars agreeing with flyers fans about the goal. It is becoming a joke the refereeing, I think most will agree when it's inter conference games the reffing is usually poor but not biased but when any team from Scotland plays especially nottingham, games are being almost handed to them as if it's not hard enough, that's why people call it europes pub league I'm afraid!
|
|
|
Post by Dirkster23 on Mar 10, 2014 22:09:03 GMT
You get a better view of the Frank/Henley incident here at 7.30 in. I'm amazed that Darnell just called it as 5 + Game.
|
|
|
Post by bevster on Mar 10, 2014 22:51:25 GMT
Im more amazed that after reviewing it Hanson took no further action. Actually I'm not, it wasn't Matt after all.
|
|
|
Post by hueymactavish on Mar 11, 2014 6:43:27 GMT
The Henley/Frank incident is very similar to the Nickerson/Frank incident where Matt got his 9game ban. Do we know for sure that Clan asked for a review? If not, do clubs need to ask or can Hanson review incidents at his own leisure?
Does anyone know what was Fulton's penalty at the end of the game?
|
|
|
Post by harlan on Mar 11, 2014 7:16:51 GMT
Fultons penalty at the end of the game was just a two minute penalty,he got shown to the dressing room because it was the last minute of the game and the officials didnt want anything else kicking off with him still on the ice.
|
|
|
Post by tequila on Mar 11, 2014 10:09:15 GMT
So frank being a twat again !!,btw he on sunday hit sacchetti with his stick drawing blood and getting 4 mins surely one day he will be dealt with !!
|
|
|
Post by coloradoflyer on Mar 11, 2014 12:18:08 GMT
that was worse than matt and frank and he 12 games reduced to 9 and henley gets nothing this reeks aw right
|
|
|
Post by scoles1 on Mar 11, 2014 12:42:32 GMT
Going by whats been said on twitter braeheaddid indeed ask for a review but Hanson said no. I didnt think it was possible to rrefuse to review an incident if a club requested it.
|
|
|
Post by swarfiga on Mar 11, 2014 14:20:43 GMT
Just watched it. Not sure who that referee is? But anyway if he had any bottle he would be going to his boss and telling him that must be taken further. This is not a conspiracy against Nickerson, it's Hanson and his crew being terrified of upsetting the Black family. That's a complete joke. That in my opinion is far worse than what matt done as there are far more blows landed after he was on the deck and he went back for him more than Nickerson did. Corruption at its finest. The sooner this league is run by an independent body the better.
And how many times has Henley got to do something crazy before being branded a repeat offender?
|
|
|
Post by ckbell63 on Mar 11, 2014 18:03:21 GMT
I must say I though Moray has done a superb job this season, however in failing to deal with this incident he has made a grave error. Henley is a serial offender and should have had a 3 match ban at the very least.
|
|
|
Post by hueymactavish on Mar 11, 2014 22:00:27 GMT
12match ban at the very least, just to keep things consistent.
|
|