|
Post by zamboni on Jan 9, 2013 21:16:02 GMT
You have to ask why Caister was trying to tell the linesman that the puck had not crossed the line, he had a better view than the linesman. The linesman has blown his whistle so he is not going to change his mind..is he? The referees/linesman are always 100% correct? Caisters thinking we have a last chance to tie this game and take it to overtime with a 6 on 5 advantage then the linesman blows for offside from where i was sitting the puck didnt look like it had fully crossed the line, a highly charged situation what does Caister do fold like a' cheap suit' not a chance its not in his DNA he has red hair,should he have chose more diplomatic words absouloutley,what did the linesman say to Caister we dont know,wheres the appeals process for the club?There isnt one or they dont know how to use it, Wheres the video camera at the same side so you have no DVD to rely on,who suffers the most? us, the paying public/fans, was the last game againt Sheffield great ?you bet,who wants to go on Saturday night pay there £15 and watch Sheffield rip us apart because we are already one import short through choice,our Captain/Star man is out injured,Caister is banned. We all will because we are true fans or just plain daft!! Whats the options team Danny up with Keller ,Danny played well on the D last season. 1st line Pitts,Chaumont,McAlpine 2nd line Hogger ,Dutes, Gunny 3rd line JD,Wilson, Scoony Or stay at home and spend all night watching the web site for an update...the choice is yours as they say.
|
|
|
Post by nobabody on Jan 9, 2013 22:12:27 GMT
You have to ask why Caister was trying to tell the linesman that the puck had not crossed the line, he had a better view than the linesman. The linesman has blown his whistle so he is not going to change his mind..is he? The referees/linesman are always 100% correct? Caisters thinking we have a last chance to tie this game and take it to overtime with a 6 on 5 advantage then the linesman blows for offside from where i was sitting the puck didnt look like it had fully crossed the line, a highly charged situation what does Caister do fold like a' cheap suit' not a chance its not in his DNA he has red hair,should he have chose more diplomatic words absouloutley,what did the linesman say to Caister we dont know,wheres the appeals process for the club?There isnt one or they dont know how to use it, Wheres the video camera at the same side so you have no DVD to rely on,who suffers the most? us, the paying public/fans, was the last game againt Sheffield great ?you bet,who wants to go on Saturday night pay there £15 and watch Sheffield rip us apart because we are already one import short through choice,our Captain/Star man is out injured,Caister is banned. We all will because we are true fans or just plain daft!! Whats the options team Danny up with Keller ,Danny played well on the D last season. 1st line Pitts,Chaumont,McAlpine 2nd line Hogger ,Dutes, Gunny 3rd line JD,Wilson, Scoony Or stay at home and spend all night watching the web site for an update...the choice is yours as they say. or...there is a webcast this weekend is there not ? i'll be there, C section or the bear pitt, whichever you prefer
|
|
|
Post by heggig on Jan 9, 2013 22:16:06 GMT
Yeh, it was a terrible call and I think it was the 3rd poor offside call of the night. Doesn't excuse Caister screaming in the linesmans face, though. I don't mind him having a word but screaming like that is only going to result in one thing.
|
|
|
Post by The Horse™ on Jan 9, 2013 23:58:07 GMT
What I would say, is the EIHL need to be seriously reviewing their referee pool, as all the player bans and fines, half them are for problems with the officials. The problem is, Mike Hicks doesn't go and contact Ref's who could officiate this level...so we have officials sitting doing games below this level being missed!! Unless you are up someone's bum, you have no chance
|
|
|
Post by jamestkirk on Jan 10, 2013 1:02:38 GMT
What I would say, is the EIHL need to be seriously reviewing their referee pool, as all the player bans and fines, half them are for problems with the officials. The problem is, Mike Hicks doesn't go and contact Ref's who could officiate this level...so we have officials sitting doing games below this level being missed!! Unless you are up someone's bum, you have no chance That's a ridiculous thing to say - completely untrue - and said by a mod!! Dearie me!
|
|
|
Post by sparkymark75 on Jan 10, 2013 8:20:14 GMT
The problem is, Mike Hicks doesn't go and contact Ref's who could officiate this level...so we have officials sitting doing games below this level being missed!! Unless you are up someone's bum, you have no chance That's a ridiculous thing to say - completely untrue - and said by a mod!! Dearie me! Mod's are allowed an opinion just as much as anyone else.
|
|
|
Post by sparkymark75 on Jan 10, 2013 8:30:10 GMT
|
|
|
Post by coloradoflyer on Jan 10, 2013 8:44:38 GMT
well the conspiracy theory might be right then lol
|
|
|
Post by nobabody on Jan 10, 2013 8:46:34 GMT
aha...indeed only 2 listed as abuse
|
|
|
Post by flyersfaninfife on Jan 10, 2013 11:05:31 GMT
If I remember correctly, in the Dundee game Jeff got a 10 min for mouthing off at Wilson then once in the penalty box he started throwing the toys out the pram with chairs going flying. Am I thinking of the correct game? If so, it seems strange it wasn't recorded on the game sheet. I would still appeal it as the abuse penalty wasn't officially recorded, or maybe its just a typo on the game sheet on the website...
|
|
|
Post by coloradoflyer on Jan 10, 2013 11:20:40 GMT
it was against dundee am sure, aye he went berserk throwed the chair, but if it's not recorded then surley it should still be 2 pens so he should playing, i would appeal
|
|
|
Post by jamestkirk on Jan 10, 2013 12:11:13 GMT
All 3 misconducts were indeed for abuse.
|
|
|
Post by jamestkirk on Jan 10, 2013 12:13:14 GMT
That's a ridiculous thing to say - completely untrue - and said by a mod!! Dearie me! Mod's are allowed an opinion just as much as anyone else. Of course they are but I meant the insinuation, which IMHO is somewhat childish!
|
|
|
Post by beanster on Jan 10, 2013 12:53:15 GMT
All 3 misconducts were indeed for abuse. There was also a misconduct called at Edinburgh that was abuse of official was there not? If I remember rightly, he made a suggestion to Smith - I think it was - by way of a gesture.
|
|
|
Post by nobabody on Jan 10, 2013 13:25:44 GMT
but on the game report it says......
"This report has been checked and verified against the Official ELITE Ice Hockey League Game Report."
so although 3 misconducts, maybe even 4, there are only two recorded as abuse
there may be another explanation, perhaps the ban is due to three 10 minute misconducts being taken, it's just supplementary info that they are for abuse? doesn't read that way but the addition of a comma changes the meaning significantly
|
|