|
Post by zamboni on Nov 10, 2016 13:36:15 GMT
Better giving Chaumont a try out than continuing using a D man doing his best or brining in Ben Davis He can score goals, people didn't want Foxy back, but he has upped his game Who do you put him with? 2nd line Looks like Schaber is on the 3rd with Finuchi and Scoon/Gunny if and when he falls back in to favour
|
|
|
Post by zamboni on Nov 10, 2016 13:42:28 GMT
We should be asking the guy that got us Shane Owen to sort us out a Forward
|
|
drwho
Rookie
Posts: 141
EIHL Team: Fife Flyers
NHL Team: Philadelphia Flyers
|
Post by drwho on Nov 10, 2016 14:20:05 GMT
Better giving Chaumont a try out than continuing using a D man doing his best or brining in Ben Davis He can score goals, people didn't want Foxy back, but he has upped his game Who do you put him with? 2nd line Looks like Schaber is on the 3rd with Finuchi and Scoon/Gunny if and when he falls back in to favour Ben Davis The guy that's signed with Coventry
|
|
|
Post by Dirty Lyle on Nov 10, 2016 14:22:18 GMT
If he does come back it will be to hugely divided opinion that's for sure.
|
|
|
Post by zamboni on Nov 10, 2016 14:55:40 GMT
If he does come back it will be to hugely divided opinion that's for sure. Brexit, Trump , Chaumont They say bad things come in threes................
|
|
watcher
Junior
Posts: 710
EIHL Team: Fife Flyers
NHL Team: Vancouver Canucks
|
Post by watcher on Nov 10, 2016 16:37:27 GMT
Sorry, but if bringing back Chaumont is the best we can do then things must be really dire at the club. The comment from his previous club seems to sum him up. Past his sell by date.
|
|
grm
Rookie
Posts: 83
|
Post by grm on Nov 10, 2016 19:26:46 GMT
Bringing back Chaumont would be a retrograde step. He was fantastic alongside pitton and Haynes but is fundamentally lazy. IMO we should replace Stockton and finucci with power and size and thank isaacs but let him go
|
|
|
Post by joestoyanovich on Nov 10, 2016 19:49:04 GMT
Bringing back Chaumont would be a retrograde step. He was fantastic alongside pitton and Haynes but is fundamentally lazy. IMO we should replace Stockton and finucci with power and size and thank isaacs but let him go I agree, a couple of players like a Colt King or a Jason Pitton are what we need. Beef us up a bit in attack.
|
|
CraggyP
Junior
Posts: 903
NHL Team: Tampa Bay Lightning
|
Post by CraggyP on Nov 10, 2016 20:04:23 GMT
Yip that would do nicely ,as many proposed during the off season but where do you find these players at this point ? Difficult for the owners though ....they need money to pay the bills just as everyone does to see the team on a Saturday night ...... Bigger sponsers maybe mean Bigger pockets ? ....COYF
|
|
|
Post by swarfiga on Nov 10, 2016 20:25:57 GMT
Just better more balanced recruitment needed from day 1 at the rink
|
|
CraggyP
Junior
Posts: 903
NHL Team: Tampa Bay Lightning
|
Post by CraggyP on Nov 10, 2016 20:49:44 GMT
Just better more balanced recruitment needed from day 1 at the rink Did you never link the lack of early Import signing to .... small fish in a big pond ?
|
|
|
Post by swarfiga on Nov 10, 2016 21:29:40 GMT
Just better more balanced recruitment needed from day 1 at the rink Did you never link the lack of early Import signing to .... small fish in a big pond ? We're arguably the 5th biggest club in the league! In my opinion anyway so don't think it's that, certainly have the potential for that
|
|
|
Post by johndabomb on Nov 10, 2016 21:55:29 GMT
Did you never link the lack of early Import signing to .... small fish in a big pond ? We're arguably the 5th biggest club in the league! In my opinion anyway so don't think it's that, certainly have the potential for that Rein it in son. We're clearly behind the big five of Sheffield, Nottingham, Braehead, Belfast and Cardiff. And a quick look at Coventry's recent trophy cabinet would suggest they're pushing us into seventh. Of the remaining three Dundee and the Caps are rendered minnows by virtue of their dreadful attendances but the Storm have a much more professional and polished product off and on the ice compared to us and they're only in their second season of existence, future growth may be hamstrung by their rink but they're doing all the right things whilst we stand still.
|
|
|
Post by swarfiga on Nov 10, 2016 21:57:17 GMT
We're arguably the 5th biggest club in the league! In my opinion anyway so don't think it's that, certainly have the potential for that Rein it in son. We're clearly behind the big five of Sheffield, Nottingham, Braehead, Belfast and Cardiff. And a quick look at Coventry's recent trophy cabinet would suggest they're pushing us into seventh. Of the remaining three Dundee and the Caps are rendered minnows by virtue of their dreadful attendances but the Storm have a much more professional and polished product off and on the ice compared to us and they're only in their second season of existence, future growth may be hamstrung by their rink but they're doing all the right things whilst we stand still. Iv never bought the braehead thing, you telling me the 500-1000 they get extra offset the massive arena costs?
|
|
|
Post by johndabomb on Nov 10, 2016 23:19:44 GMT
Rein it in son. We're clearly behind the big five of Sheffield, Nottingham, Braehead, Belfast and Cardiff. And a quick look at Coventry's recent trophy cabinet would suggest they're pushing us into seventh. Of the remaining three Dundee and the Caps are rendered minnows by virtue of their dreadful attendances but the Storm have a much more professional and polished product off and on the ice compared to us and they're only in their second season of existence, future growth may be hamstrung by their rink but they're doing all the right things whilst we stand still. Iv never bought the braehead thing, you telling me the 500-1000 they get extra offset the massive arena costs? Judging by the amount of money they spunk on their roster in terms of both imports and Brits I'd wager it makes some difference! Of course this season they're showing us that money isn't everything.
|
|