|
Post by mosh86 on Dec 26, 2012 15:05:25 GMT
looks like rules for some and different rules for others. Also i've copy and pasted this. The committee would like to stress that clubs cannot appeal any match penalties handed out on the night, but the committee have the power to increase or overturn these penalties. So it was the commitee that have overturned krantz penaltiy.! Funny one there Or am i getting mixed up with game penaltys.! lol i'm lost now.
|
|
|
Post by austin on Dec 26, 2012 15:11:52 GMT
Haha, I saw that bit as well. As I said I'm sure they'd never make it up as they went along I wasn't at the game so can't really comment on the penalty, but it's pretty farcical that the governing body of the country's biggest league contradicts itself so much.
|
|
|
Post by tequila on Dec 26, 2012 15:16:50 GMT
Based on this thread, I have drawn the following conclusions; Dundee are a big club. Fife are not a big club. why do you continuosly come on here and talk utter pash !!!!
|
|
|
Post by mosh86 on Dec 26, 2012 15:19:47 GMT
i know its the holiday period but some sort of club statment about this would be nice. Maybe get one tommorrow tho.
|
|
|
Post by harlan on Dec 26, 2012 16:17:38 GMT
Just posted about this on Twitter - here's a round-up of the initial penalties from the Coventry v Cardiff debacle earlier in the season - www.eliteleague.co.uk/match-penalties--p179951Olson was given a penalty for "excessive roughness", which carried an automatic one game ban. Jason's penalty has the exact same name, but it carries for a minimum of three games. Did they re-write the rule book after the Olson carry-on? If not then I don't see how a 3-game penalty for Jason can hold any water. It wouldn't be like the Elite League to make it up as they went along of course, but surely that sets some sort of precedent? Again, if they re-wrote the rules colour me wrong, but surely food for thought. I am assuming that as an excessive roughing penalty is a match penalty and carries an automatic one game ban and a match penalty is then reviewed by the disciplinary committee which is probably why he has got the two extra games because of the review
|
|
|
Post by mosh86 on Dec 26, 2012 16:33:35 GMT
but they dont say that harlan. all it says is this carries an automatic 3 match ban and i cant see that on the iihf rule book or the elite webite rules
|
|
|
Post by harlan on Dec 26, 2012 16:38:51 GMT
No I know that mosh but when do you expect clarity and openness from this league.
I was taking my bit from the link that austin had posted and what the league said about Olsons penalty
|
|
|
Post by mosh86 on Dec 26, 2012 16:41:31 GMT
ok i understand what your getting at now. The leauge is a bit of a joke. defo need some clariy on this!
|
|
|
Post by sparkymark75 on Dec 26, 2012 17:03:22 GMT
Hutchins could regret this longer term. Makes it easier for Braehead to pick up points against us making it harder for Dundee to close the gap and the next time we meet them after Thursday, Jason could be raging and cause havoc.
|
|
|
Post by dysartflyer on Dec 26, 2012 17:06:49 GMT
Hutchins was laughing on Twitter about some irate tweets he had recently received from Clan fans. He seems to be a first-rate tool?
|
|
|
Post by austin on Dec 26, 2012 17:08:07 GMT
Aye, that does make a bit more sense if that's the case Harlan. Still a little confused as to how they can say the minimum punishment for excessive roughness is 3-games when they're on record as handing out a one-game suspension for the same call earlier in the season though.
Also, what did Olson end up with when he punched Hogg(I think?) in the back of the head after the final hooter down in Coventry early on in the season? I'd say that's the very definition of a sucker punch, so if he was given any less than 3-games (which I don't think he was) then it just shows how hamfisted this whole carry-on is. I do remember him getting at least a match penalty after the game.
Wasn't at Dundee so I can't comment on what Jason did, but surely needs to be one rule for all?
|
|
|
Post by jamestkirk on Dec 26, 2012 17:43:45 GMT
Folks there is an automatic 3 game tariff on a match penalty for excessive roughness. If that penalty has been called earlier in the season then a 3 game ban would follow!
|
|
Mike
Rookie
Posts: 82
|
Post by Mike on Dec 26, 2012 17:46:09 GMT
Folks there is an automatic 3 game tariff on a match penalty for excessive roughness. If that penalty has been called earlier in the season then a 3 game ban would follow! Two instances cited in this thread where that penalty was called and a one game suspension followed.
|
|
|
Post by gascan on Dec 26, 2012 17:48:51 GMT
OK lets sum it up in ONE word.... FARSE!!
|
|
|
Post by mosh86 on Dec 26, 2012 17:54:21 GMT
Folks there is an automatic 3 game tariff on a match penalty for excessive roughness. If that penalty has been called earlier in the season then a 3 game ban would follow! But where about does it say this apart from on the post.? Plus there is two other incidents that have reported this as not to be the case.!
|
|