|
Post by jamestkirk on Dec 26, 2012 18:06:54 GMT
There are NO other instances where this penalty received a 1 game ban - zero, zilch!
|
|
|
Post by jamestkirk on Dec 26, 2012 18:07:47 GMT
Please advise me where they are and I will clarify?
|
|
|
Post by jamestkirk on Dec 26, 2012 18:13:04 GMT
Check that, I see you are talking about Benn Olson of Coventry in one of the incidents.
For clarification the PR did mention a one game ban but that was an error as the minimum is a three game ban (a few tariffs were increased before the season started and Chris probably was not aware of this) - in any case that particular penalty to Olson was cancelled after review.
Is there another instance?
|
|
|
Post by harlan on Dec 26, 2012 18:35:48 GMT
You show us where it says that it is an automatic three game ban
|
|
|
Post by jamestkirk on Dec 26, 2012 18:39:17 GMT
It doesn't show you anywhere currently TBH but that's something for the league to perhaps add to the website.
I'll mention it!
|
|
|
Post by harlan on Dec 26, 2012 18:41:23 GMT
No thanks. Think we will leave it for Jack and Tom to represent us at league meetings
|
|
|
Post by jamestkirk on Dec 26, 2012 18:43:24 GMT
Don't understand your last post harlan - I personally see no reason why the tariffs could not be on the website seeing as other penalty info is!
Or is it just you that doesn't want it on there (just wondering when you said 'we')?
|
|
|
Post by mosh86 on Dec 26, 2012 18:51:15 GMT
So if this automatic three match ban isn't written in the rules the penalty can't stand can it!?
|
|
|
Post by daviejojo on Dec 26, 2012 18:55:09 GMT
And why nothing about the Stars players tweets after Sunday?
|
|
|
Post by jamestkirk on Dec 26, 2012 18:55:32 GMT
It is in the rules - all the rules are not published - as you are no doubt aware!
Flyers will be well aware of the tariffs.
|
|
|
Post by jamestkirk on Dec 26, 2012 18:56:34 GMT
Guys, I am only commenting on the tariffs, I cannot comment on other things as I have no knowledge of them.
|
|
Kev
Rookie
66%
Posts: 277
|
Post by Kev on Dec 26, 2012 18:56:47 GMT
is this the same jameskirk that thinks he is the dugs baws on the clan forum?
|
|
|
Post by buyer on Dec 26, 2012 19:51:29 GMT
JamesTKirk = our old friend Ronnie, beloved and respeted poster on many forums ???
|
|
|
Post by harlan on Dec 26, 2012 19:55:29 GMT
You are not a representative of this club JTK, we don't need you mentioning anything for us.
Your club is in bad enough shape we don't need you to drag us down to its level
|
|
|
Post by jamestkirk on Dec 26, 2012 20:05:31 GMT
So sorry, thought perhaps giving you some facts might have been helpful to re-balance some of the inaccurate statements on this issue.
What you think of me is not really my concern but I was trying to help you understand.
I'm sure some of you do get that!
As I said earlier Jack and Tom will be aware of the tariffs for the various offenses and will have voted for them in the first place but I guess you can ask them if you don't believe me.
|
|