|
Post by nobabody on Nov 24, 2017 20:01:09 GMT
Got to say that seems more like a personal point of view rather than enforcing rules. It almost smacks of someone who has an issue with the player. If I was Rosehill I wouldn't be that happy with some of the content of that statement from the league. It looks like nothing more than 2 guys getting into an altercation and that fact they are both on the ice during the roughing I dont see anything to warrant any ban. Funny how they make no mention of the puck being about 30 feet away from Rosehill when he gets hit. Yep. Quite surprised by the tone of the report. Agree that there are much worse incidents that go relatively unpunished and you are right in spotting how late the actual hit was. don't think the hit is late but the explanation sounds like something from a teenagers squabble, minus the sweary stuff, weird!
|
|
CraggyP
Junior
![*](//storage.proboards.com/forum/images/stars/star_blue.png)
Posts: 899
NHL Team: Tampa Bay Lightning
|
DOPS
Nov 24, 2017 20:42:16 GMT
Post by CraggyP on Nov 24, 2017 20:42:16 GMT
Well said , its definitely the weirdest DOPS explanation so far imo. It seems so vindictive and unnecessary I doubt this one came from the new US team advisories
|
|
|
DOPS
Jan 11, 2018 19:31:59 GMT
Post by sparkymark75 on Jan 11, 2018 19:31:59 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Dirty Lyle on Jan 11, 2018 20:47:59 GMT
Having watched video, can't complain, he was a bit silly really
|
|
CraggyP
Junior
![*](//storage.proboards.com/forum/images/stars/star_blue.png)
Posts: 899
NHL Team: Tampa Bay Lightning
|
DOPS
Jan 11, 2018 21:02:37 GMT
Post by CraggyP on Jan 11, 2018 21:02:37 GMT
Silly and lots have hit the puck after a bad decision but ......... You have to give the refs/linesmen total protection and respect so for DOPS to give a ban of 1 game puts it out there that this sort of indiscipline will not be tolerated.
|
|
CraggyP
Junior
![*](//storage.proboards.com/forum/images/stars/star_blue.png)
Posts: 899
NHL Team: Tampa Bay Lightning
|
DOPS
Jan 11, 2018 21:42:47 GMT
Post by CraggyP on Jan 11, 2018 21:42:47 GMT
Although I have justified this 1 game ban it does seem that we have far too many 'soft' penalties called recently. IMO I don't think half of the hooking / slashing penalties would have been called even last year, never mind back in the 80's/90's . I remember when you had to hold on a hook and get carried up the ice before it was called - or slash 2 or 3 times on the stick/glove to get a call. I personally believe a little hook / slash is necessary in hockey and acceptable ask any other Ex player... Also the poke check this year which ended in the player put into the box - it was timed perfectly and NOT a penalty. Tommy likes his Hip checks etc . These skills are now getting punished wrongly too many times now IMO.
REF's chill out slightly PLEASE - Don't ruin hockey !
|
|
|
DOPS
Dec 26, 2019 14:28:26 GMT
Post by zamboni on Dec 26, 2019 14:28:26 GMT
DOPS rules 72 hours to publish reviews Must be using Christmas to extend the period Giants don't play today so tomorrow at latest then ?
|
|
|
Post by perfectnightmare on Dec 26, 2019 20:34:10 GMT
DOPS rules 72 hours to publish reviews Must be using Christmas to extend the period Giants don't play today so tomorrow at latest then ? Did you mean to post on a 2 year old thread?
|
|
|
DOPS
Dec 26, 2019 20:34:19 GMT
via mobile
Post by Dirty Lyle on Dec 26, 2019 20:34:19 GMT
DOPS rules 72 hours to publish reviews Must be using Christmas to extend the period Giants don't play today so tomorrow at latest then ? Or as is more likely..no action
|
|
|
DOPS
Dec 28, 2019 0:30:09 GMT
via mobile
Post by zamboni on Dec 28, 2019 0:30:09 GMT
DOPS rules 72 hours to publish reviews Must be using Christmas to extend the period Giants don't play today so tomorrow at latest then ? Or as is more likely..no action Pelech played tonight So no announcement does that mean no footage to review Surely DOPS need to make a statement
|
|
|
Post by Dirty Lyle on Dec 28, 2019 10:55:09 GMT
Or as is more likely..no action Pelech played tonight So no announcement does that mean no footage to review Surely DOPS need to make a statement Nope..it was changed 2 seasons ago because of the amount of reviews they would only comment on any action taken.. convenient now that they don't have to explain non decisions..no transparency, supports the conspiracy theory.
|
|
|
Post by waterboy on Dec 28, 2019 14:43:20 GMT
Pelech played tonight So no announcement does that mean no footage to review Surely DOPS need to make a statement Nope..it was changed 2 seasons ago because of the amount of reviews they would only comment on any action taken.. convenient now that they don't have to explain non decisions..no transparency, supports the conspiracy theory. This is from the EIHL website DOPS section. So a review of the penalty should have taken place and result released to clubs and the eihl media team to release to the public.
|
|
|
DOPS
Dec 28, 2019 17:46:20 GMT
via mobile
Post by Dirty Lyle on Dec 28, 2019 17:46:20 GMT
They have changed it..this was two seasons ago they done it..hence no negative press releases..would not surprise me if they just have not updated their own rules
|
|